Controversies Associated With Dissociative Disorders
The diagnosis of the psychiatric disorders including their treatment is marred by controversies, and this is particularly noticeable with the dissociative disorder (DDs). A person with these disorders exhibits various symptoms such as having distorted perceptions about others, and experiencing amnesia. People with history of trauma that particularly occurs early in one’s life, can expose them to the risk of developing these disorders (Subramanyam et al., 2020).
To effectively care for patients with DDs, a psychiatric should be aware of these controversies, adopt sound professional beliefs about the DDs, and embrace strategies that can help maintain therapeutic relationship with the client with a dissociative disorder as described in this paper.
The Controversy that surrounds Dissociative Disorder
Certain controversies are associated with the DDs. One of these controversies involves the tendency for people to see the manifestations as fake, and this is the reason why people would question whether these disorders represent the trend that individuals may want to associate with. The DDs are also mired in controversies because of their complex nature. In fact, one needs to conduct deep research to understand these disorders.
Unfortunately, peoples’ tendencies to dismiss the research on these disorders is the reason why there is limited understanding of the DDs among those affected by the disorders. Still, there are those who question the notion that trauma that occurs early in one’s life can cause the DDs because of the difficulty involved in proving the truthfulness of the memory of abuse.
My Professional Beliefs about Dissociative Disorders
My professional beliefs hinge on my knowledge about mental health, and these beliefs shape my interaction with a patient with a dissociative disorder (DD). I believe that DD is a mental condition like any other, and that the use of appropriate intervention, can help lessen the symptoms of this condition. I also believe that the evidence and psychiatric knowledge should inform the treatment of the DD.
My belief about the DD is informed by the fact that its manifestations affect one’s functioning (Meganck, 2017). It therefore, has the potential to exacerbate mental health issues ranging from depression to memory loss. Therefore, I don’t believe in the controversies linked to DD because they can affect my judgment, and cause poor diagnosis outcomes.
Order this paper