The Assignment: (2–3 pages) Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. How was the success of the program or policy measured? How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in yo

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Patient Self-Management Support Programs
Description The program’s objective is to assess the significance of a four-component intervention meant to prevent falls-related injuries. Part of the intervention will involve the use of customized action plan which emphasizes empowering patients to understand how to manage falls.
How was the success of the program or policy measured? To determine the program’s success, the researchers collected data on cases of falls recorded in hospitals, and data that patients and physicians provided. The data was specifically collected from patients who visited the emergency departments seeking treatment for the injuries sustained during falls.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? To ensure that the program benefits as many people as possible, 5,757 individuals, considered to be at an increased risk of fall were targeted. Following the implementation of the program, hospitals recorded fewer cases of falls. Patients and health insurers spent less on injuries related to the falls (Glasgow, Lichtenstein, & Marcus, 2003). Therefore, the inference that one can make based on these results is that the program is provides an effective intervention for mitigating the costs.
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? Those involved in the implementation of the program used the LifePlans data to examine whether the program was effective in terms of contributing to the decline in cases of falls.
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified? Because patients took arrhythmia and other medications that raised the patients’ risk of fall, the unintended consequences reported included bruises.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. The healthcare professionals and the Medicare beneficiaries aged 75 years and above primarily participated in the program. Insurers equally took part in the program implementation. Because the program seeks to reduce the risk of falls among patients, the program benefitted patients more than any other group of stakeholders (Turner et al., 2022).
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? The program attained the objective for which it was intended. This is because after measuring the outcomes, those who implemented the program found that hospitals reported fewer incidences of falls. This is because the interventions proposed as part of the program were effective to cause the decline in rates of falls among patients who took Medicare.
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not? Considering that the program addresses the factors that contribute to falls, I would suggest that the program be adopted in my workplace. Using the program, it would be possible to use it to determine how effective a falls prevention system is (Shiramizu et al., 2016).
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation. Working within the capacity of a nurse advocate, I could participate in assessing the efficacy of the program by assessing patients as part of the process of collecting data (Williams & Anderson, 2018). During patient assessment, I would focus on the patients’ history of falls, recording this information so that it can help those who would evaluate the program’s effectiveness, evaluate its benefit.
General Notes/Comments One of the things that one should keep in mind is that assessing how effective a program is, is important in the sense that it helps optimize the outcomes of interventions meant to minimize cases of falls. It is also worth noting that when gathering data, one should be consistent in terms of how they collect data (Milst

Order this paper

The Assignment: (2–3 pages) Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. How was the success of the program or policy measured? How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? Would you recommend i

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis

Health programs help improve engagement and empower people to adopt quality behaviors to enhance individual and communal welfare. It targets behaviors that reduce wellness, but which can be modified through education and mentorships. Health programs reduce disease incidence, and therefore, healthcare costs. Sexual and reproductive health continues to draw the attention of medical practitioners because of the negative effects they introduce across populations. The purpose of this health program is to educate and empower young and older adults into making quality decisions that will promote their sexual and reproductive health Assessing a Healthcare Program Essay.

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation  

 

Planned Parenthood
Description Planned Parenthood program intends to educate young and old people men and women on sexual and reproductive health. Topics that will be handled in the program are family planning, contraception, abstinence, sexual orientation, safe sex, family life, parent-child communication, sexuality, teenage pregnancy, and women’s health education (Primrose, 2012).
How was the success of the program or policy measured? The program’s success was measured using the following indicators

 

  • The ability of team members to provide high-quality, non-judgmental, and affordable care to all clients.
  • Ability to provide facts-based and dependable health information
  • Reduction in barriers that limited people’s access to quality reproductive and sexual health education.
  • Increased number of people who enrolled for reproductive and sexual health care education.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?

 

 

  

 

The program reached 125,000 people living within and outside the country.

This program’s impacts include engagement in responsible sexual behaviors, reduced premarital sex, reduced cases of teen pregnancies and STIs, improved communication between families, improved women’s health, and better familial relationships.

 
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?

 

 

  

 

The program team used the following data to evaluate the program’s success: the number of people educated on sexual and reproductive health, percentage of teens engaging in risky sexual behaviors, the number of teen pregnancies, number of couples who benefited from the family programs, women who accessed contraception and other health services, and participant attitudes towards the experts and quality of services offered. Data on the program’s sustainability (in terms of costs) and effectiveness of the outcomes was also used in the evaluations.
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?

 

 

  Implementing the program might have increased the percentage of people seeking abortion services.

 

Cases of individuals using emergency contraceptives (morning-after pills) increased as more people tried to reduce the chances of getting pregnant after having unprotected sex
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.

 

 

  

 

The stakeholders in the program are the patients, medical service providers (doctors and nurses), youth leaders, public health experts, and local advocates (Harris, 2016).

Members of the community are the program’s biggest beneficiaries since it was introduced and designed purposefully to cater to their needs (Harris, 2016).

 

 

 
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? The program met its objectives. However, it can still be modified to yield better results in the future. It was able

Order this paper

The Assignment: (2–3 pages) Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. How was the success of the program or policy measured? How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? Would you recommend i

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Patient Self-Management Support Programs
Description The program’s objective is to assess the significance of a four-component intervention meant to prevent falls-related injuries. Part of the intervention will involve the use of customized action plan which emphasizes empowering patients to understand how to manage falls.
How was the success of the program or policy measured? To determine the program’s success, the researchers collected data on cases of falls recorded in hospitals, and data that patients and physicians provided. The data was specifically collected from patients who visited the emergency departments seeking treatment for the injuries sustained during falls.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? To ensure that the program benefits as many people as possible, 5,757 individuals, considered to be at an increased risk of fall were targeted. Following the implementation of the program, hospitals recorded fewer cases of falls. Patients and health insurers spent less on injuries related to the falls (Glasgow, Lichtenstein, & Marcus, 2003). Therefore, the inference that one can make based on these results is that the program is provides an effective intervention for mitigating the costs.
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? Those involved in the implementation of the program used the LifePlans data to examine whether the program was effective in terms of contributing to the decline in cases of falls.
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified? Because patients took arrhythmia and other medications that raised the patients’ risk of fall, the unintended consequences reported included bruises.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. The healthcare professionals and the Medicare beneficiaries aged 75 years and above primarily participated in the program. Insurers equally took part in the program implementation. Because the program seeks to reduce the risk of falls among patients, the program benefitted patients more than any other group of stakeholders (Turner et al., 2022).
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? The program attained the objective for which it was intended. This is because after measuring the outcomes, those who implemented the program found that hospitals reported fewer incidences of falls. This is because the interventions proposed as part of the program were effective to cause the decline in rates of falls among patients who took Medicare.
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not? Considering that the program addresses the factors that contribute to falls, I would suggest that the program be adopted in my workplace. Using the program, it would be possible to use it to determine how effective a falls prevention system is (Shiramizu et al., 2016).
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation. Working within the capacity of a nurse advocate, I could participate in assessing the efficacy of the program by assessing patients as part of the process of collecting data (Williams & Anderson, 2018). During patient assessment, I would focus on the patients’ history of falls, recording this information so that it can help those who would evaluate the program’s effectiveness, evaluate its benefit.
General Notes/Comments One of the things that one should keep in mind is that assessing how effective a program is, is important in the sense that it helps optimize the outcomes of interventions meant to minimize cases of falls. It is also worth noting that when gathering data, one should be consistent in terms of how they collect data (Milst

Order this paper

The Assignment: (2–3 pages) Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. How was the success of the program or policy measured? How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in yo

Expert Answer and Explanation

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Patient Self-Management Support Programs
Description The program’s objective is to assess the significance of a four-component intervention meant to prevent falls-related injuries. Part of the intervention will involve the use of customized action plan which emphasizes empowering patients to understand how to manage falls.
How was the success of the program or policy measured? To determine the program’s success, the researchers collected data on cases of falls recorded in hospitals, and data that patients and physicians provided. The data was specifically collected from patients who visited the emergency departments seeking treatment for the injuries sustained during falls.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? To ensure that the program benefits as many people as possible, 5,757 individuals, considered to be at an increased risk of fall were targeted. Following the implementation of the program, hospitals recorded fewer cases of falls. Patients and health insurers spent less on injuries related to the falls (Glasgow, Lichtenstein, & Marcus, 2003). Therefore, the inference that one can make based on these results is that the program is provides an effective intervention for mitigating the costs.
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? Those involved in the implementation of the program used the LifePlans data to examine whether the program was effective in terms of contributing to the decline in cases of falls.
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified? Because patients took arrhythmia and other medications that raised the patients’ risk of fall, the unintended consequences reported included bruises.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. The healthcare professionals and the Medicare beneficiaries aged 75 years and above primarily participated in the program. Insurers equally took part in the program implementation. Because the program seeks to reduce the risk of falls among patients, the program benefitted patients more than any other group of stakeholders (Turner et al., 2022).
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? The program attained the objective for which it was intended. This is because after measuring the outcomes, those who implemented the program found that hospitals reported fewer incidences of falls. This is because the interventions proposed as part of the program were effective to cause the decline in rates of falls among patients who took Medicare.
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not? Considering that the program addresses the factors that contribute to falls, I would suggest that the program be adopted in my workplace. Using the program, it would be possible to use it to determine how effective a falls prevention system is (Shiramizu et al., 2016).
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation. Working within the capacity of a nurse advocate, I could participate in assessing the efficacy of the program by assessing patients as part of the process of collecting data (Williams & Anderson, 2018). During patient assessment, I would focus on the patients’ history of falls, recording this information so that it can help those who would evaluate the program’s effectiveness, evaluate its benefit.
General Notes/Comments One of the things that one should keep in mind is that assessing how effective a program is, is important in the sense that it helps optimize the outcomes of interventions meant to minimize cases of falls. It is also worth noting that when gathering data, one should be consisten

Order this paper

The Assignment: (2–3 pages) Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. How was the success of the program or policy measured? How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in yo

Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

Order this paper

The Assignment: (2–3 pages) Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. How was the success of the program or policy measured? How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in yo

Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation  H.R. 2646 (114th): Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2016
Description The Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2016 is a piece of legislation that was introduced to the House by Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Pa. And Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Texas, in July 2016 and passed into law. The Act provided reforms in federal mental health policies and programs in a way that improved access to evidence-based care for individuals and families dealing with serious mental illness (SMI). Overall, H.R. 2646 aimed to promote early intervention and crisis response and provide better resources for entire families and individuals, including children struggling with mental health issues.
How was the success of the program or policy measured?

 

 

 The success of H.R. 2646 (114th) was measured based on a number of intended outcomes after the legislation was enacted. These included assessing changes in the availability and accessibility of mental health services, evaluating the quality of care provided, monitoring the reduction of crisis situations related to mental health, and the effectiveness of preventative interventions for mental health. Other metrics include rates of suicide and attempts, emergency psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, incarcerations, victimization, and homelessness, as well as the percentage increase in grants for mental health.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? The Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2016 targeted the over 44 million Americans who experienced mental health issues annually. Notably, 18% of the U.S. population aged above 18 years has a type of mental health issue, 10 million aged above 18 years have a serious mental illness (SMI), and 2 million of the mentally ill never received treatment, while 200,000 homeless people and 300,000 jailed people have untreated mental issues (mentalillnesspolicy.org, n.d.). The Act has increased allocations for assisted outpatient treatment by $20 million annually and has supported the development of extensive evidence to support efforts made to reduce homelessness, arrest, violence, jailing, hospitalizations, and suicide among people with serious mental illness.
At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? The Act requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to make reports within six months of the implementation of the Act (Congressional Research Service, n.d.).
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? Evaluation data for the policy is diverse and focuses on the various provisions of the Act. These may include but are not limited to mental health information at the federal level, rates of reduction of homelessness, incarcerations, people with SMIs, statistics on mental health service utilization, crisis incidents, mental health patient outcomes, surveys, and the total number of mental health patients enrolled in the various programs provided for the Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2016.
What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? The H.R. 2646 (114th) eliminates the previous financial incentive to adopt assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) laws; however, it is not clear on information sharing and prohibits the use of federal funds in the lobby for mental health. It may also lead to discrimination against mental health practitioners with diplomas and degrees, as preference is given to doctors or psychologists with doctorate degrees.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Stakeholders include mental health practitioners and service providers, mental health patients and their families, schools and other education institutions, mental health facilities, government agencies such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), insurance companies, and advocacy groups. The major beneficiaries from the results and reporting would be individuals with mental health conditions and their families, as well as healthcare professionals.
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?

Order this paper

The Assignment: (2–3 pages) Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. How was the success of the program or policy measured? How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in yo

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation  H.R. 2646 (114th): Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2016
Description The Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2016 is a piece of legislation that was introduced to the House by Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Pa. And Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Texas, in July 2016 and passed into law. The Act provided reforms in federal mental health policies and programs in a way that improved access to evidence-based care for individuals and families dealing with serious mental illness (SMI). Overall, H.R. 2646 aimed to promote early intervention and crisis response and provide better resources for entire families and individuals, including children struggling with mental health issues.
How was the success of the program or policy measured?

 

 

 The success of H.R. 2646 (114th) was measured based on a number of intended outcomes after the legislation was enacted. These included assessing changes in the availability and accessibility of mental health services, evaluating the quality of care provided, monitoring the reduction of crisis situations related to mental health, and the effectiveness of preventative interventions for mental health. Other metrics include rates of suicide and attempts, emergency psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, incarcerations, victimization, and homelessness, as well as the percentage increase in grants for mental health.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? The Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2016 targeted the over 44 million Americans who experienced mental health issues annually. Notably, 18% of the U.S. population aged above 18 years has a type of mental health issue, 10 million aged above 18 years have a serious mental illness (SMI), and 2 million of the mentally ill never received treatment, while 200,000 homeless people and 300,000 jailed people have untreated mental issues (mentalillnesspolicy.org, n.d.). The Act has increased allocations for assisted outpatient treatment by $20 million annually and has supported the development of extensive evidence to support efforts made to reduce homelessness, arrest, violence, jailing, hospitalizations, and suicide among people with serious mental illness.
At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? The Act requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to make reports within six months of the implementation of the Act (Congressional Research Service, n.d.).
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? Evaluation data for the policy is diverse and focuses on the various provisions of the Act. These may include but are not limited to mental health information at the federal level, rates of reduction of homelessness, incarcerations, people with SMIs, statistics on mental health service utilization, crisis incidents, mental health patient outcomes, surveys, and the total number of mental health patients enrolled in the various programs provided for the Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2016.
What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? The H.R. 2646 (114th) eliminates the previous financial incentive to adopt assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) laws; however, it is not clear on information sharing and prohibits the use of federal funds in the lobby for mental health. It may also lead to discrimination against mental health practitioners with diplomas and degrees, as preference is given to doctors or psychologists with doctorate degrees.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Stakeholders include mental health practitioners and service providers, mental health patients and their families, schools and other education institutions, mental health facilities, government agencies such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), insurance companies, and advocacy groups. The major beneficiaries from the results and reporting would be individuals with mental health conditions and their families, as well as healthcare professionals.
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Patient Self-Management Support Programs
Description The program’s objective is to assess the significance of a four-component intervention meant to prevent falls-related injuries. Part of the intervention will involve the use of customized action plan which emphasizes empowering patients to understand how to manage falls.
How was the success of the program or policy measured? To determine the program’s success, the researchers collected data on cases of falls recorded in hospitals, and data that patients and physicians provided. The data was specifically collected from patients who visited the emergency departments seeking treatment for the injuries sustained during falls.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? To ensure that the program benefits as many people as possible, 5,757 individuals, considered to be at an increased risk of fall were targeted. Following the implementation of the program, hospitals recorded fewer cases of falls. Patients and health insurers spent less on injuries related to the falls (Glasgow, Lichtenstein, & Marcus, 2003). Therefore, the inference that one can make based on these results is that the program is provides an effective intervention for mitigating the costs.
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? Those involved in the implementation of the program used the LifePlans data to examine whether the program was effective in terms of contributing to the decline in cases of falls.
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified? Because patients took arrhythmia and other medications that raised the patients’ risk of fall, the unintended consequences reported included bruises.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. The healthcare professionals and the Medicare beneficiaries aged 75 years and above primarily participated in the program. Insurers equally took part in the program implementation. Because the program seeks to reduce the risk of falls among patients, the program benefitted patients more than any other group of stakeholders (Turner et al., 2022).
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? The program attained the objective for which it was intended. This is because after measuring the outcomes, those who implemented the program found that hospitals reported fewer incidences of falls. This is because the interventions proposed as part of the program were effective to cause the decline in rates of falls among patients who took Medicare.
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not? Considering that the program addresses the factors that contribute to falls, I would suggest that the program be adopted in my workplace. Using the program, it would be possible to use it to determine how effective a falls prevention system is (Shiramizu et al., 2016).
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation. Working within the capacity of a nurse advocate, I could participate in assessing the efficacy of the program by assessing patients as part of the process of collecting data (Williams & Anderson, 2018). During patient assessment, I would focus on the patients’ history of falls, recording this information so that it can help those who would evaluate the program’s effectiveness, evaluate its benefit.
General Notes/Comments One of the things that one should keep in mind is that assessing how effective a program is, is important in the sense that it helps optimize the outcomes of interventions meant to minimize cases of falls. It is also worth noting that when gathering data, one should be consistent in terms of how they collect data (Milst

Order this paper