Electronic health information technology has transformed the healthcare field, but the triumphant execution of electronic health information technology needs cautious planning, deliberated thinking, including a devotion to change management. Triumphant execution of electronic health information technology needs heedful planning, execution, and continuing appraisal. The first tactic is to evaluate the organization’s preparedness for electronic health information technology execution, involving the organization’s culture, infrastructure, including resources (Fennelly et al., 2020). Including critical stakeholders, like clinicians, staff, patients, and technology pundits, is vital in the planning and execution process. The second step is to choose and execute the appropriate electronic health information technology system, meeting the organization’s requirements and needs. Tutoring and sustenance for all users are crucial to ensure the effectual and coherent use of the electronic health information technology system. Continuing appraisal of the electronic health information technology system is appropriate in ensuring that it is meeting the organization’s goals and objectives and remaining current and updated with new technology and supervisory needs (Zhang et al., 2018). Victorious execution of electronic health information technology can enhance patient care, improve efficiency, minimize costs, and improve patient safety. This paper analyzes the ramifications of an organization not including nurses in each stage of the system, examples of potential issues, and the importance of nurse inclusion in avoiding such issues.
The execution of a new health information technology system is a multiplex process involving numerous stakeholders and nurses. Nurses are vital in patient care and often use health information technology systems. Accordingly, eliminating nurses in each stage of the systems development life cycle when purchasing and executing a new health information technology system can have crucial outcomes on patient safety, workflow coherence, and overall satisfaction with the new system. Throughout the first stage of the systems development life cycle, the planning stage, the project squad associates the goals and intentions of the new health information technology system (Malinda Burt et al., 2019). Eliminating nurses from this stage can lead to a lack of comprehension the nursing workflow, patient care processes, and the distinctive requirements of the nursing staff. It can also result in a mismatch between the system’s design and the users’ fundamental requirements. As an outcome, the system may not sufficiently support the nursing workflow, and nurses may scuffle to use the system, resulting in carelessness and possible patient safety risks.
The second stage of the systems development life cycle is the examination stage, where the project squad estimates the existing system and associates the needs for the new health information technology system. Eliminating nurses from this stage can lead to a lack of comprehension of the current nursing workflow, possible risks linked with the current system, and the requirements of the nursing staff (Hardiker et al., 2019). It can also result in a misfiring to recognize essential needs and possible areas of enhancement, impacting patient safety, workflow coherence, and overall reimbursement with the new systems. Throughout the design stage, the project squad develops the stipulations for the new health information technology system based on the needs highlighted in the analysis stage. Eliminating nurses from the stage can lead to a lack of comprehension of the nursing workflow, resulting in a user-unfriendly system design that does not appropriately support the nursing workflow and may result in errors and wastefulness. The execution stage entails equipping and arranging the new health information technology system. Eliminating nurses from the stage can lead to a lack of comprehension of the nursing workflow, leading to poor system arrangement and errors, wastefulness, and possible patient safety risks. The last stage of the system development life cycle is the maintenance stage, the project squad ensures the system remains running, and refreshes and upgrades are performed as required (Kramer, 2018). Eliminating nurses from this stage can lead to a lack of apprehension about continuing nursing workflow changes, leading to the misfiring to make appropriate refreshes and upgrades, resulting in carelessness and possible patient safety risks. Comprehensively, nurses are essential stakeho
Order this paper