Healthcare informatics ushered in a new era of artificial intelligence and novel technology, making healthcare delivery much easier, better, and sophisticated. The breakthrough report To Err Is Human, published and issued by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1999, was essential in driving this shift away from traditional manpower-based methods to healthcare service delivery (Palatnik, 2016). According to this estimate, around 98,000 individuals died each year in the United States as a result of preventable medical errors at the time. The goal of this research is to look at four cases that show how clinical systems can help improve outcomes and efficiency.
Background
As a result, one of the IOM report’s multiple suggestions was that technology be used to reduce the incidence of human mistake. This indicates that it was recognized that technology will play a key role in facilitating the efficacy of healthcare interventions and increasing patient outcomes. Following the publication of that report, many healthcare organizations began to recognize the value of having electronic patient records and medical information. Legislation has also begun to target healthcare organizations’ implementation of health information systems (HIS). Healthcare providers and institutions purchased and installed electronic health records (EHR) systems from available vendors to demonstrate acceptance and compliance (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017).
Four Current Scholarly Studies
The four studies that were obtained from databases published in the recent five years are listed below. They are peer-reviewed research articles that highlight the significance of clinical systems in improving patient outcomes and facilitating the efficiency of healthcare practitioners and the interventions they deploy. It’s worth mentioning that all of the clinical systems investigated in these studies are technologically based. They are:
Alotaibi, Y., & Federico, F. (2017). The impact of health information technology on patient safety. Saudi Medical Journal, 38(12), 1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631
The goal of Alotaibi and Federico (2017)’s research was to find evidence that clinical systems based on technology are important in improving outcomes and facilitating efficacy. They discovered overwhelming evidence in support of at least 14 clinical systems that are often utilized by various providers to improve performance and the quality of care they offer to patients. Their strong counsel, on the other hand, is that the provider must carefully consider which clinical system to employ and from which vendor to obtain it. This is because their research demonstrated that not all vendors’ ostensibly new clinical systems are evidence-based. Patient data management systems (PDMS), computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, electronic medication administration record (eMAR), electronic medical record (EMR), patient care portals, bar code medication administration (BCMA), and clinical decision support (CDS) systems are some of the clinical systems for which they found evidence of a role in improving outcomes and increasing efficacy (Alotaibi & Federico, 2017). Proper patient information management (by PDMS), effective and error-free drug prescription and medication administration (by COPE and BCMA), and other improvements to outcomes and effic
Order this paper