One area that significantly impacts quality patient care and health outcomes is the financing of the U.S. health care system. The high cost of health care and the lack of universal health insurance coverage can create barriers to accessing care, particularly for low-income individuals. This can lead to delayed or foregone care, which can negatively impact health outcomes.
A potential health care reform solution to improve effectiveness in this area is the implementation of a single-payer health care system. This system would be financed by the government, which would provide health care for all residents. This could improve access to care, reduce financial barriers to care, and potentially improve health outcomes.
The effect of health care reform on the U.S. health care system and its respective stakeholders would be significant. For patients, a single-payer system could improve access to care and reduce financial stress related to health care costs. For health care providers, it could lead to changes in reimbursement rates and potentially increase the demand for services. For insurance companies, it could significantly alter their role in the health care system.
In a peer-reviewed journal article by Woolhandler and Himmelstein (2016), the authors argue that a single-payer system could reduce administrative costs and improve health outcomes. However, they also note that such a system would require significant political and financial commitment.
In conclusion, the U.S. health care system's delivery, finance, management, and sustainability methods have significant implications for quality patient care and health outcomes. Health care reform, such as the implementation of a single-payer system, could potentially improve effectiveness in these areas. However, such reform would have significant effects on the U.S. health care system and its stakeholders.
Reference:
Woolhandler, S., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2016). Single-Payer Reform: The Only Way to Fulfill the President's Pledge of More Coverage, Better Benefits, and Lower Costs. Annals of Internal Medicine, 166(8), 587-588.