Protecting Participants in Human Research Human research has long been regarded as crucial to improvements in human health and well-being (University of Alaska Fairbanks, n.d.). According to University of Alaska Fairbanks (n.d.), human research subject protection is essential for ensuring the safety of participants in studies and experiments. According to University of Alaska Fairbanks (n.d.), guidelines are in place to safeguard study participants from unethical treatment or abuse. Maltreatment of human exploration subjects should be stayed away from no matter what in the event that we are to keep leading essential examinations with uprightness. Human research has the potential to do a lot of good, but only if it is done in an ethical and responsible way.
NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 1 Protecting Human Research Participants
The current approach to protecting human subjects has evolved over the course of the past century in response to questionable ethical conduct in research (White, 2020). An extended practice of utilizing what is currently perceived as weak gatherings as study subjects might be followed back to the early utilization of kids and prisoners (White, 2020). Participants in the studies rarely gave their informed consent, did not comprehend the study’s purpose, or were frequently provided with no information (White, 2020).
NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 1 Protecting Human Research Participants
The Tuskegee Experiment and criminal experiments carried out in German concentration camps during World War II are two examples of situations in which human participants were exploited while being the subject of research (White, 2020). According to White (2020), the Tuskegee experiment tested a drug on 399 syphilis patients and 201 uninfected controls from the African American community surrounding Tuskegee, Alabama. In exchange for their participation in the study, the men received free checkups, food, and funeral coverage (White, 2020), but they were not permitted to give informed consent. Since the study’s objective was to ascertain how the condition progresses in unmanaged cases, no intervention was provided (White, 2020). The study was supposed to run for just six months, but it has been going on for four decades (White, 2020). By 1945, it was established that penicillin was a safe and effective treatment for syphilis (White, 2020). After the viability of penicillin was illustrated, the US General Wellbeing Administration made treatment centers, however the information from the Tuskegee preliminaries were considered too crucial for even think about disposing of; As a result, the study was extended without treating the subjects (White, 2020). Another example of research subjects suffering harm is the Nazi-occupied German concentration camps (White, 2020). According to White (2020), the so-called physicians of the concentration camps performed unethical medical procedures on prisoners, resulting in impairment, disease, and death.
Order this paper