Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) self-management consists of several actions and approaches. In a review carried out by Winkley et al. (2020), the self-management of Type 2 Diabetes refers to the activities and actions of healthcare professionals and nurses, and stakeholders to treat and control the condition. Since millions of US citizens have type 2 diabetes, patients must know how to monitor their health adequately. This presentation explores various aspects of diabetes self-management systems in healthcare organizations, such as testing blood sugar (glucose), using a balanced meal plan for patients, and helping them with regular exercise plans (Agarwal et al., 2019). This study describes how and why we are monitoring the outcomes of type 2 diabetes to improve care.
NURS FPX 6414 Assessment 2 Video Presentation and Spreadsheet: Proposal to Administration
Since more than 500 million people in the US have type 2 diabetes, measuring this specific outcome is vital for helping patients with diabetes to learn self-management skills through diabetes self-management education (Adam, 2018). For example, the DSMES program will provide educational and learning support to patients to control their disease. These learning outcomes aim to help community members gain more awareness of self-management skills and adopt positive self-management behaviors. Moreover, the Chronic Disease Management system CDMS is a vital program to help such people manage their lower blood sugar (glucose) levels and also reduce complications. These measures are vital for improving the life quality of patients and can also help hospitals reduce their healthcare costs (Agarwal et al., 2019). Moreover, outcome measures are vital standards that help to establish a patient baseline.
NURS FPX 6414 Assessment 2 Video Presentation and Spreadsheet: Proposal to Administration
The benchmarks are related to type 2 diabetes state according to the American Diabetes Association, most people in the United States suffering from this disease have an acceptance rate of below 7% as a benchmark (van Smoorenburg et al., 2019). Moreover, more strong emphasis is placed on reducing patients’ weight by up to 15% based on the efficacy of drugs and medications (Apovian et al., 2018). Furthermore, the patient mortality rate is 5%, which is relatively high, and that is due to poor hospital care quality.
There are a few data measures and trends which need to be considered for this evaluation of this specific line of service. For example, the following data measures are apparent from the evidence available such as:
Order this paper