Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the votes views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re- elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria. .

The Democratic Party stresses fairness, social equality, and strengthening the social safety net through liberalism and based on progressivism. Conversely, the Republican Party supports lower taxes, free market and capitalism and increased military spending. Each party have contrasting ideas from economics, military spending, and social and human ideas. A cost-benefit analysis is a method businesses use to examine decisions. The business or analyst calculation the benefits of a situation or action and then subtracts the costs related to taking that action. Government legislators and regulatory decision makers utilize this tool often since 1993 to assess policies and how to move forward with them if at all (Cost-Benefit Analysis, n.d.). Milstead & Short define legislators as “elected officials who serve in the state legislature or the U.S. Congress that make decisions regarding bills and resolutions pending before the legislative body to which they have been elected” (p. 38). Essentially, they work on making changes to existing laws or passing new legislation based on their constituents’ needs. Repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) entirely is estimated to cost approximately $350 billion by 2027 saving $1.55 trillion in coverage provisions by 2027 and $750 billion in coverage and revenue provisions. A delay in repeal would decrease savings to $300 billion (“The Cost of Full”, 2017). The ACA is a comprehensive health care law signed and enacted in 2010 by the Obama Administration with the key goals of forming a cost efficient health insurance plan accessible to more individuals that provided appropriations to customers that decrease household costs with annual income between 100 and 400 percent of the federal poverty line. It expanded the Medicaid program to insure people whose annual income was below 138 percent of the federal

Order this paper