Incorporating theoretical guiding frameworks is paramount in enhancing the systematic integration of evidence-based practice into nursing care. The Translational Research Model (TRM) offers a valuable framework for bridging the gap between research findings and clinical application. By employing the TRM, nurses can systematically assess, adapt, and implement evidence in a phased approach, ensuring a smooth transition from research to practice. Additionally, the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework provides a structured guide for understanding the multifaceted elements influencing successful evidence implementation (Krishnaswami et al., 2020). This framework emphasizes the interaction between evidence, context, and facilitation, guiding nurses in comprehensively addressing organizational, cultural, and individual factors that may impact evidence-based practice adoption. By employing these theoretical frameworks, nurses gain a systematic and holistic approach to applying evidence, mitigating potential barriers, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement in patient care.
State board nursing practice standards serve as a regulatory framework that significantly influences the care provided to patients like Mr. Johnson. In the context of cardiovascular care, standards often emphasize the need for evidence-based practice, ensuring that nursing interventions align with the latest research findings (White et al., 2020). For example, if state standards mandate adherence to specific cholesterol management protocols, nurses caring for Mr. Johnson must follow these guidelines to provide consistent and high-quality care. These standards not only guide clinical decision-making but also underscore the importance of ongoing education and professional development to stay abreast of evolving evidence in cardiovascular nursing.
Organizational and governmental policies further shape the landscape of cardiovascular care for Mr. Johnson. For instance, if the healthcare organization has policies promoting patient-centered care, nurses must actively engage Mr. Johnson in shared decision-making regarding his treatment plan. Governmental policies related to reimbursement structures may influence the availability of resources for cardiovascular interventions, potentially impacting the accessibility of certain treatments or technologies for Mr. Johnson (Nicholls et al., 2020) . Additionally, policies addressing health disparities may guide nurses in providing equitable care, ensuring that Mr. Johnson, regardless of his socio-economic background, receives optimal cardiovascular care aligned with organizational and governmental standards.
Order this paper