The Best Places to Access Resources for CKD
Several places within a healthcare setting can be used for effective evidence-based research related to CKD. Capella University Online Library is the largest resource within the organization that helps researchers find vast information sources from several databases such as CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library. Besides online libraries, a physical library with medical journals, textbooks, and other professional resources is the best place to conduct effective research. These spaces are beneficial as they provide a quiet and focused environment for nurses to conduct in-depth research.
Additionally, librarians can offer assistance in locating and accessing pertinent information, making the research process more efficient. Similarly, hospital-based online sources such as information portals, hospital policies, procedures, and guidelines are significant places for research. Since these resources are established within the hospital, they provide information consistent with hospital practices, ensuring nurses align their practice with the hospital’s benchmarks.
Computers at nurse workstations also have access to these resources. Lastly, clinical research offices may provide access to databases, research protocols, and specialized software for data analysis. This setting fosters a collaborative environment where nurses learn from experienced researchers, influencing their clinical practices.
The Five Credible Sources for CKD
The five credible and relevant resources to find pertinent information about CKD are websites like the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The former provides information specific to kidney disorders and their management. However, the CDC website provides general information about all diseases and their control and prevention.
This website can help prepare care plans for CKD patients and comorbidities. Databases like PubMed and journals like the Journal of Renal Nutrition and the American Journal of Kidney Diseases are beneficial to providing kidney-specific, credible, and authorized information, ensuring the integration of evidence-based practices for caring for CKD patients.
Justification of the Credibility of The Resources
The criteria that can be used to determine the credibility of the resources is CRAAP testing. Currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose are the divisions of these criteria, where currency defines how up-to-date the information is. Secondly, relevance is about the relatability of the content with the research topic. Authority explains the credibility of the authors and the journal/website used to research. Furthermore, accuracy defines the study’s claims as accurately supported using evidence. Lastly, the purpose of the study/information is consistent with the purpose of the research (Esparrago-Kalidas, 2021).
The website NIDDK provides credible, evidence-based research information about chronic health conditions and their treatment. This website also presents healthcare challenges that patients, families, and populations encounter for specific diseases, including kidney disorders (NIDDK, n.d.). Furthermore, the CDC is a governmental website dedicated to enforcing strict scientific protocols, guaranteeing the credibility and relevance of the information sources. CDC regularly solicits feedback from qualified peer reviewers to monitor the app
Order this paper