NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 2: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Student Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX 4010 Leading in Intrprof Practice

Prof. Name:

Date

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Ms. Henna participated in an interview that was held in a hospital setting. The questions were ready to go ahead to get all the needed material, and the discussions were taped. As a geriatric nurse, Ms. Henna is responsible for providing for the needs of the elderly, assisting with everyday tasks, evaluating mental state, identifying common health concerns, managing prescriptions, and educating patients and their families.

Interview Summary

Ms. Henna said that her position requires her to be knowledgeable in various medical topics so that she can effectively assess and treat her patients’ varied health concerns. This worries her as well, as she often requires the advice of professionals for her patients when their inquiries involve particular ailments. However, experts’ heavy workloads and frequently uncooperative attitudes make it difficult to schedule a consultation (Chouvarda et al., 2019).

Though there are no established guidelines or frameworks, management does expect medical professionals to react to requests from colleagues to satisfy patients’ requirements. This means it takes Ms. Henna a while to conduct her job and serve the patient since she must wait for confirmation and instruction from her coworkers (Jeon et al., 2019).

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 2: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Ms. Henna claims that the interprofessional cooperation was better in her former employer, which she attributes to the fact that it was a smaller hospital. New methods of diagnosis and treatment were promoted during group meetings, and specialists shared data on when they would be seeing patients. The issue discussed in this interview is the lack of collaboration among the interdisciplinary team. Ms. Henna has observed a lack of teamwork at this facility, with staff members only talking to one another about various concerns when required (Dahlke et al., 2018).

Identification of the issue

The interview highlights that the lack of structure makes it difficult for medical staff to do their tasks and collaborate, which is a significant problem at the hospital. Because of this drawback, patients often must wait for extended periods for nurses to check on them and attend to their requirements. Ms. Henna adds that she often attempts to figure out things independently if her level of skill permits it since she believes she can learn everything quicker than waiting for professionals. This strategy fails to help patients and may even be detrimental. The hospital also suffers from a lack of a collaborative culture, which would allow for faster responses to requests from colleagues and the creation of novel, more efficient methods of diagnosis and treatment. These elements must be strengthened to promote teamwork among healthcare providers and raise standards of care for the senior population (Giannitrapani et al., 2019). The primary reason for the lack of collaboration among the interdisciplinary team is the lack of responsibility and commitment toward providing the best quality of care to the patients. An evidence-based interdisciplinary approach that can improve collaboration is practical communication skills and understanding and respecting each other’s roles. This will ensure that every interdisciplinary team member plays their part in the interdisciplinary collaboration. Leadership and management also play a vital role in improving interdisciplinary collaboration.

Change Theories that Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution

Lewin’s three-stage theory of change (unfreezing, moving, and refreezing) is best suited to enhancing teamwork and a multidisciplinary approach (PARK et al., 2021). The first phase is identifying issues that are hindering team communication and goal setting, which in turn will help workers find a sense of purpose in their job. The second phase entails a more subtle transition or alteration. According to PARK et al. (2021), one of the most important things to do at this stage is to include staff in developing a new system of interactions. The second stage is to set new standards using talking to and getting to know the staff, as well as instituting punishment and incentive program. PARK et al. (2021) use a more involved method, relying on several theoretical frameworks to achieve their end aim. However, this source is also applicable to the task at hand since it demonst

Order this paper