I would select a quantitative design to collect data and evaluate the effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal. The goal of quantitative research is to gain a better understanding of the social world (GCU, 2021). Researchers use quantitative methods to observe situations or events that affect people. Quantitative research generates objective data that may be expressed concisely using numbers and statistics. The PICOT question asks whether providing pre-admission educational sessions will improve health literacy and health outcomes in orthopedic patients and families with low health literacy. This question can be answered with quantitative data, such as scores on a health literacy assessment or measures of health outcomes.
There are a few reasons why a quantitative design is best for this project proposal. First, quantitative data is more objective and reliable than qualitative data, and it can be analyzed using statistical methods to provide a deeper understanding of the effects of the intervention (GCU, 2021). This is important because the project proposal is trying to measure the effectiveness of an intervention, and objective data is more likely to provide accurate results. Second, quantitative data can be analyzed using statistical methods, which can help to identify patterns and trends in the data. This can help to provide a deeper understanding of the effects of the intervention.
During the 90-day postoperative period, quantitative methods such as surveys or questionnaires could be used to collect data on variables such as health literacy levels, patient-reported outcomes such as pain levels, mobility, functional status, and healthcare utilization such as hospital readmissions and emergency room visits. This quantitative data would allow for statistical analysis and comparison between the intervention group (pre-admission educational sessions) and the control group (standard care), providing objective evidence of any improvements. To collect the data, a validated tool such as the Health Literacy Assessment Tool or the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) could be used to assess health literacy, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (n.d.). These tools have established reliability and validity in assessing the constructs of interest in healthcare research.
References
Gcu. (2021, June 7). Why Is Quantitative Research Important? GCU. https://www.gcu.edu/blog/doctoral-journey/why-quantitative-research-important
Personal Health Literacy Measurement Tools. (n.d.). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/research/tools/index.html
Order this paper