NRS 433V RS2 Research Critique Guidelines Part I critical appraisal Qualitative Research Critique

 

There are many reasons why qualitative research sources are important in the research process. Perhaps the most obvious reason is that they provide a wealth of information that can help researchers to better understand their topic of interest. Qualitative data can provide insights into peoples’ motivations, attitudes, and behaviors – information that is often difficult to obtain through other means. In addition, qualitative data can be extremely useful in generating hypotheses and testing theories. By understanding how real people think and feel about a given issue, researchers can develop hypotheses that are much more grounded in reality than if they were relying solely on quantitative data or their own personal observations. Finally, qualitative data can help to broaden our understanding of complex phenomena. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the two qualitative articles discussed in topic 1.

Background of Study

The two qualitative studies that have been used in the research include qualitative study I, “Clinical impact of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes” by Fujiwara et al., (2021) and qualitative study II, “Patient barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative study” by Carter et al., (2018)

From qualitative article I, the clinical impact of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular disease has been extensively studied. The article provides an excellent overview of this hypertensive care that greatly relate to the PICOT question. The study authors sought to determine the clinical impact of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes. The study included a total of 24,153 participants with a mean age of 67 years. The participants were followed for a mean period of 4.6 years. During the follow-up period, there were 1,481 cardiovascular events, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. After adjusting for potential confounders, the authors found that each 20-mmHg increase in the maximum mean systolic blood pressure was associated with a significant 23% increased risk of cardiovascular events. This finding was consistent across different subgroups defined by age, sex, and prevalence of hypertension. The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical impact of the maximum mean value (MMV) of home blood pressure (BP) on cardiovascular risk in a middle-aged general population. The objective of the study was to determine the clinical impacts of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes. The article is significant to nursing because it provides different strategies on the management of patients with blood pressure and the approaches to take. The main problem being addressed in the article is blood pressure among different patients. The main research question is: What are the clinical impacts of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes?

Qualitative study II emphasizes nurses’ understanding of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring services. According to the article, there are many potential barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring. By understanding these factors, healthcare providers can develop strategies to improve patient compliance and ensure that this important tool is used effectively. Carter et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review of the literature on this topic and identified several key themes. These included patients’ beliefs about their condition and treatment, desires for self-management, concerns about confidentiality, ease of use of devices, spousal support or interference, cost, health literacy, and prior experience with device use. The article is significant to nursing because it provides various strategies on how to manage blood pressure among the patients under home-based care and in different healthcare institutions. The purpose of the study was to investigate Patient barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring. The objective of the study was to determine the nurses’ understanding of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring services. The main research question in the article is: What are the possible patient barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring services?

How The Two Articles Support the Nurse Practice Issue Chosen

The two articles emphasize nurses’ understanding of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring services. The information can be applied to address different aspects of the PICOT question. The information on the implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among patients from the two articles can be applied in addressing different aspects of the PICOT que

Order this paper