North Carolina Psychiatric State Laws
The state laws on involuntary psychiatric children and adults aim at protecting individuals suffering from mental health issues. The law further gives health officials and law enforcement officers guidelines to hold patients involuntarily. The patients should have all the signs of being a source of danger to others because of their mental health. The law permits mental health professionals to hold adults for 24 hours in a facility, during which the mental health professionals examine the state of the individuals.
In the case of children, the law states that law enforcement officers or any authorized persons may take the children into custody and later to a 24-hour facility for temporary custody. The courts may order the facility to hold minors and adults for ten days for further examination. Once the patients are well, the court releases them, and responsible persons may pick them up as designated by the courts.
North Carolina laws give directions on emergency hold for psychiatric patients; medics may provide emergency evaluations for up to 24 hours for patients who are ill and may pose a danger to themselves or others. In-patient commitment occurs when a patient proves to be mentally ill, and they could be a risk to other people and may need medical attention. The facility then holds the patient in a hospital for care and treatment.
Outpatient commitment occurs to patients with all the signs of being mentally ill and needing treatment. The facility may not hold the individual, but they receive the required treatment as ordered by the courts. The courts may order outpatient treatment for a maximum of 180 days.
Capacity in mental health refers to the ability of a person to make decisions. Clinical determinations capacity involves a person’s capability to understand the consequence of their choices. The person who knows how to communicate the decisions also falls under capacity. Competency involves a person’s ability to attend legal proceedings and understand what laws or charges against them. Competency falls under the legal wing, and the courts determine competency as not decision specific.
Patient autonomy is the principle that ensures patients have the right to make medical decisions. Informed consent falls under patient autonomy; informed consent ensures patients can access the potential risks or benefits of undergoing certain medical procedures. The medics should obtain informed consent, failure to which they may face the law.
According to North Carolina state law, an ethical issue is a conflict between protecting the patients from harm and patient autonomy. Sometimes the medics may override the patients’ autonomy in cases where they are dangerous to themselves by taking necessary steps to safeguard their safety.
The evident based suicide risk assessment may be essential is the Columbia Suicide severity rating scale. The scale assesses the patient’s behavior and intentions to commit suicide. The medics may use the tool in the medical setup under the emergency department to measure the suicide risk of the patient. The tool is easy to use and provides appropriate interventions in cases of need.
The evidence-based violence risk assessment medics use the Risk Management -20 (HCR-20) tool on patients. The tool asses the individual history of violence or criminal behavior. The tool’s outcome is important in measuring the violence risk in different correctional facilities and clinics. Therefore, the medics provide appropriate interventions to patients with a history of violence.
References
Swartz, M. S. (2020). The urgency of racial justice and reducing law enforcement involvement in involuntary civil commitment. Psychiatric services, 71(12), 1211-1211.
https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.ps.711202
Veri, S. D. (2021). A 360° View of Psychiatric Boarding in the Emergency Department (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte).
https://search.proquest.com/openview/553b6b8c9a094fe515a90ef942920630/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Williams, J. B. (2021). Involuntary Civil Commitment: Time for Another Pendulum Swing? North Carolina Medical Journal, 82(2), 149-149.
https://ncmedicaljournal.com/article/55344.pdf
Download this sample Order this paper