The Christian narrative indicates that suffering and the world's fallenness go together. The Christian perspective suggests that suffering started in the Garden of Eden when Eve failed to obey God's commandment and ate the forbidden fruit. Additionally, the Christian perspective indicates that God distanced Himself from humanity when He was disobeyed. Therefore, God condemned humans to eternal suffering, which was the genesis of suffering. God said sinners should suffer, which is the Christian perspective of suffering and fallenness. Therefore, in this case, study, George can associate his suffering with being a sinner and unfit for God's favor. George can interpret his suffering as a sinner because God ordered that sinning be punished with suffering. When we fall ill, we often associate our suffering with God's punishment for disobeying His commandments. In the beginning, when Adam and Eve lived in the Garden of Eden, sinning and suffering were foreign concepts. However, when Eve sinned (eating the forbidden fruit), suffering started, and humans fell short of God's grace. Therefore, when we suffer, we often associate our suffering with punishment from God. George can interpret his suffering as a punishment for his actions. Being a professional and accomplished lawyer, may he jailed an innocent person or let a guilty one run free. Therefore, based on the Christian narrative, he can associate his suffering (ALS) with punishment for his bad actions. Humans sin continuously and often do not deserve God's grace (Bernstein, Alan, 2020). It is human nature to sin, and suffering goes hand-in-hand with sinning from a Christian perspective. Therefore, George can associate his suffering with
4 falling short of God's grace, and he can also associate it with the sins he has committed. George can think that he is suffering the consequences of his actions. For example, being a lawyer, he may have won a case for a person charged with murder or child molestation and allowed them to walk free. Therefore, he can think that he is suffering the consequences of such actions. Interpretation of George's Suffering in Light of the Christian Narrative with Emphasis on the Hope of Resurrection. The Christian narrative states that Jesus came to the world to give humans hope and to shed his blood to offer humans forgiveness and reconnect them with God (Wright, Nicholas Thomas, and Michael F. Bird, 2019). The Christian narrative indicates that Jesus died and was resurrected, showing that he had fulfilled his duty of unifying humans with God. Therefore, George can interpret his suffering with the hope of resurrection. When Jesus died and was resurrected, it gave Christians hope that after death, they shall also resurrect and ascend to heaven, where they shall have a better experience. George's suffering can be associated with how Jesus suffered before dying and his eventual resurrection. The Christian perspective indicates that, after suffering, George shall die and resurrect with new hope. As George contemplates life with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), how would the Christian worldview inform his view about the value of his life as a person? As George thinks about his life with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the Christian worldview can inform his view about the value of his life as a person in multiple ways. First, the Christian worldview can tell his opinion about the importance of his life by showing him that life is a precious gift from God. Since George considers euthanasia, the Christian worldview can inform him that because God gave him life as a gift, it should not be taken away by human actions. According to the Christian worldview, George should persevere through the pain and
5 suffering because there is a reward after all the agonizing torture. The Christian worldview shows that, after suffering on earth, death is not the end. The Christian worldview offers that humans shall receive new life in heaven and should therefore endure all the pain and suffering on earth. What sorts of values and considerations would the Christian worldview focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia? The Christian worldview indicates that, just like Jesus suffered and conquered death without giving up, humans should endure all the suffering with the hope and promise of a better outcome (Lewis Hall, M. Elizabeth, and Peter Hill, 2019). Christians should accept suffering because of the greater reward. The Christian worldview states that the reward was the resurrection and a new life after Jesus suffered and died on the cross. Therefore, the Christian worldview would focus on the values in deliberating whether George should opt for euthanasia is the promise of a greater reward after all the suffering on earth. Given the above, what options would be morally justified in the Christian worldview for George and why? Under the above, the option that wou
Order this paper