How do evidenced-based practice (EBP) projects, quality initiatives, and research studies differ?

How do evidenced-based practice (EBP) projects, quality initiatives, and research studies differ?

One key difference between EBP projects, quality initiatives, and research studies is the level of rigor involved in the design and execution of the project. EBP projects involve the use of the best available evidence to inform decision-making, whereas quality initiatives and research studies typically rely on consensus or expert opinion (O’Leary, 2020). Another key difference is the purpose of each type of project. EBP projects and quality initiatives improve the quality of care delivered to patients, whereas research studies purpose to directly to improve the quality of evidence to support practice. Collectively, they all improve patient safety. It is also important to note that EBP projects, quality initiatives, and research studies vary in terms of their funding sources. EBP projects typically receive funding from the organization in question. In contrast, quality initiatives and research studies may receive funding from various sources, including government agencies, private organizations, and philanthropic organizations (Thome et al., 2020). Another key difference is that research studies apply a methodological approach (quantitative or qualitative) to develop new ideas and knowledge, whereas quality initiatives and EBP projects may improve the quality of care delivered to patients.

Order this paper