The main difference in funding between the 911 ambulance and the private healthcare providers is the source of revenues. The public providers are paid by the taxpayers’ money, regardless of whether or not they will use the services (Calams, 2021). The mean hourly wage of the EMTs is $17.02, while the annual wage is averaged at $36,110 (Calams, 2021). However, the costs of public ambulances differ across agencies, municipalities, and the type of care given to patients. An example of the D.C Fire and EMS given by Calams (2021) states that the BLS transport costs an estimated $428. Other charges include ALS, ALS-2, and per load mile with averaged costs of $508, $735, and $6.55, respectively (Calams, 2021). Therefore, the funding for the public 911 calls comes from the government.
On the other hand, the funds for the private ambulance service providers come from the users of the services. The patients will be responsible for compensating the private EMS agencies for all services delivered, either through cash payments or through insurance for those providers that accept them. Calams (2021) reveals that private EMS may pay less than public agencies, but they will be more willing to hire less experienced EMTs.
Additionally, the costs of private EMS depending on the type of service offered. Currently, there are inadequate figures to show estimates for private providers. However, the main difference is that the private providers get paid directly from the clients while the 911 responders are funded by the government. Most importantly, it is critical to acknowledge that private providers can also get funding from the municipalities when they are contracted to offer EMS services. Additionally, private providers can be recruited by individual healthcare facilities, in which case they can get funding from such institutions.
In the State of Texas, Medicaid provides free transportation for patients and other eligible Medicaid clients. The pre-condition for these services is that the clients have no alternative means of transportation. However, the issue with ambulances is less straightforward because of the problem of pre-authorization. Medicaid requires that prior authorization be given before undertaking the transport services. However, it is essential to understand that the pre-authorization is not an affirmation that the insurer will pay for the services.
In Texas, there used to be a large prominent health system where pre-authorizations were effectively conducted. The situation has changed as a result of the changes in payers. The State now faces a situation of constant denials for pre-authorization, which has ultimately reduced the efficiency of the process. Therefore, it can be argued that the presence of many payers and the tendency to hold down the costs of the healthcare system are key contributors to the challenges faced by Texans. Additionally, it has been expressed that that pre-authorization is not a confirmation that Medicaid services will pay for the costs. Therefore, the ambulance services face a situation of uncertainty, meaning they cannot offer their services effectively.
Besides the issue of multiple payers, it is also important to acknowledge other causes of difficulties. Registration errors are other examples where patients previously authorized through commercial insurance change to Medicaid after a change in their financial status. In such a situation, there was no authorization from Medicaid, which makes it hard for claims to be accepted. There are also several requirements needed for Medicaid’s pre-authorization, which could also be a key hindrance. Therefore, the main reason that it is increasingly difficult to obtain a pre-authorization in the State of Texas is that the pre-conditions and requirements are difficult to meet.
The importance of private ambulance providers has been outlined earlier. Therefore, it is time to examine a scenario where private providers did not exist. First, it can be argued that that the current shortage would be worse than it is now, and the country would be facing a crisis. The gaps left by the public providers would not be filled, and the entire healthcare system would be in much greater chaos. Second, the new EMT graduate would not have a means of building their resume for the public sector. As mentioned earlier, private ambulances are more inclined to hire less-skilled EMTs. Such an act cannot be criticized as a possibility of offering lower-quality services. Rather, the private providers should be applauded for offering new graduates an opportunity to build their careers and prepare them for the better-paying public sector.
Lastly, the absence of private providers can create further gaps in care delivery due to ov
Order this paper