“Medical professionals, not insurance company bureaucrats, should be making healthcare decisions.” (Barbara Boxer). Clinical decision support systems are tools that are based on computers enabling healthcare providers to make informed decisions about patient care (Musen et al., 2021). They use patient and clinical comprehension data to create suggestions, mnemonics, and apprises, enabling healthcare providers to constructively diagnose and treat patients. Clinical decision support systems improve patient outcomes by minimizing medical errors, enhancing diagnostic exactness, and maximizing adhesiveness to evidence-based guidelines. They also improve communication and alliance between healthcare providers because they obtain and share patient information and plans for their treatments. These systems can transfigure healthcare as they provide practical and precise decision support to healthcare providers and enhance patient care and outcomes. This essay will explain how one can seek support for clinical decision-making, determine the integrity of the gathered information, and the advantages and disadvantages of using computerized clinical decision-support systems in clinical practice.
Clinical decision-making is a compound process involving incorporating extensive amounts of information and providing outstanding patient care. Looking for support for clinical decision-making involves numerous ways, including consulting clinical guidelines, peer-reviewed pamphlets, and skillful opinions (Angelis et al., 2018). Clinical guidelines dispense evidence-based directions for specific conditions or treatments, and peer-reviewed pamphlets dispense the current research findings. Skillful opinions can also be entreating from other healthcare professionals. It is essential to ascertain the gathered information’s integrity before making a clinical decision. It can be performed by seriously analyzing the spring of the information, involving the quality and applicability of the evidence, possible conflicts of amusement, and the author’s or publisher’s plausibility (Wallach et al., 2018). When making clinical decisions, it is crucial to think about the patient’s attributes and partiality. A rigorous and methodical perspective to seeking support for clinical decision-making can enhance patient outcomes and healthcare eminence.
Computerized clinical decision systems are intended to enable healthcare providers to make patient care decisions. In clinical practice, the use of computerized clinical decision systems has numerous advantages. Computerized clinical decision systems are essential as they minimize medication errors that involve drug-drug interactions (Sutton et al., 2020). Combination of computerized clinical decision systems and other systems reduces prescribing error rates for drug allergy detection, excessive dosing, and incomplete or unclear ordering. Most clinical decision systems, errors can still occur if providers neglect or intentionally work around the technology. Computerized clinical decision systems improve patient safety through reminder systems for other medical events, not just those related to medication. This can be seen when a clinical decision support system for blood glucose measurement in the ICU can minimize the number of hypoglycemia events.
Clinical decision support systems increase adherence to clinical guidelines, and it is significant as traditional clinical guidelines and care pathways have been indicated to be arduous to implement in practice with low clinician adherence. They also notify clinicians to reach out to patients who are not following management plans or are due for follow-up and enable spot patients eligible for research based on specific criteria (Sutton et a., 2020). Clinical decision support systems are cost-effective for health systems through clinical interventions minimizing inpatient length-of-stay. They also alert the user of cheaper options for drugs or conditions covered by insurance companies. They provide support for clinical and diagnostic coding, ordering of procedures and tests, and patient array and directly improve the quality of clinical documentation. A tocology clinical decision support system featuring and enhancing prompt system notably improves documentation of indications for labor induction and evaluated fetal weight compared to the control hospital. Using computerized clinical decision systems in clinical practice can be essential as it can improve the quality of care, minimize error
Order this paper