Case Study: Healing and Autonomy Assignment Essay Write a 1,200-1,500 word analysis of “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy.” In light of the readings, be sure to address the following questions: Under the Christian narrative and Christian vision, what sorts of issues are most pressing in this case study? Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James? Case Study Healing and Autonomy Assignment According to the Christian narrative and the discussion of the issues of treatment refusal, patient autonomy, and organ donation in the topic readings, how might one analyze this case? According to the topic readings and lecture, how ought the Christian think about sickness and health? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James?

Beneficence:The attending physician believed that James required immediate dialysis to prevent further kidney injury. Mike and Joanne thought that they needed to be faithful and take their son to the healing service to be cure. They had seen friends get better after attending one of this services, they thought that by taking James they would show faith in God and God would heal their son so that he would not need dialysis at all. Both parties, the attending physician and the parents disagreed on what benefits James the most, but is clear that both parties think they know what is best for James. Who is right? both could have been right but, at the end of the case study we find that the Dr. was right and James needed dialysis at that moment. Nonmaleficence: The attending physician has a moral duty to promote James health and he knows that is imperative for him to get dialysis to help his kidney restore function, the physician does not want to inflict harm or suffering on James but he understands that this is what James needs at this point. The parents believe their son will be cure if they attending the faith healing service, after all they have witness miracles. The physician has a duty to do what is best for his patients and he knows that by waiting more time might make James' kidney worse than what it is at this time but, he also understand that he has to respect the parents decision. The physician probably knows that Mike and Joanne want what is best for their son, he is respecting the parent's autonomy. The parents believe that if their son is cured he won't even need dialysis at all and they will avoid any suffering cause by dialysis

Order this paper