George’s story and the critical life-ending decision that he has faced demonstrated the multidimensional aspect of the healthcare provider’s responsibility in front of the patient. When addressing such crucial choices in life, one should acknowledge the patient’s religious identity and personal beliefs and values. This issue is highly important for the clinician to make the appropriate decision that meets both Christian ethics and traditions, as well as the code of ethics for healthcare providers and medical protocol. If I were in George’s situation, I would most likely give preference to voluntary euthanasia concerning the issue of self-dignity and power. This important decision has to be made given the family members who would have to deal with all the consequences of their father and husband being deprived of mobility, speech, and vital functions.
By analyzing the Christian perspective, one may conclude that human life is of the utmost importance and the highest value of an individual. The Christian’s dignity is connected with their creation in the image of God. George might choose between a supreme act of sacrifice to serve God’s purpose or relieving his and his family’s suffering by accepting euthanasia. Studying death and dying in terms of the religious point of view is indeed a complex and multifaceted issue to consider. George’s suffering might be perceived as a sin or an unfortunate turn of events for him and those he loves. The Christians are united to Jesus in their own suffering, and their own pain can bring spiritual growth in front of God. Most importantly, when facing Christian patients, healthcare providers need to understand the foundation of their calling to medicine and deliver comfort, care, and cure.
Bogue, D. W., & Hogan, M. (2020). Foundational issues in Christian spirituality and ethics. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision making in health care. Grand Canyon University.
Order this paper