Introduction. The world has been undergoing persistent transformation. Some of these transformations have been attributed to the trending developments in science and technology. Hereunder, among many areas encompassing science and technology that have impacted on human lives, information technology has stood out. Indeed, information technology has changed the lives of people across the globe. Information technology has reduced the world to a global village through fostering of advanced forms of communication. However, with the advancements in information technology have arisen insecurity issues. Insecurity issues have in turn sparked far reaching implications to the users. In particularly, insecurity issues in information technology have been closely associated with internet usability. This comes when the usefulness of internet cannot be presently overemphasized. It is for this reason that information technology and security issues become critical. Important, though, have been the concerns on how to address these forms of insecurity. The aspect on information technology that is paramount to this discussion is cyber bullying. Cyberbullying has been known to affect mostly the youth especially of school going age and partly adults who often use internet and mobile phones for communication purposes. As research would have it, cyberbullying has been said to vary with age. However, one thing that remains unclear is whether gender affects cyberbullying. This paper seeks to find out if actually gender is a factor as far as cyberbulling is concerns. The paper approaches this topic sing different points of views as pointed out by a number of researchers. It involves controversy and issues opposing viewpoints of different researchers to this topic. Background information Cyber bullying has emerged to be the newest platform on which the youths are increasingly abusing each other According to (Hopeline 73). The more concerning issue is that there are currently no appropriate techniques that intervene for cyber bullying despite large numbers of kids who access the information technologies. Internet and cell phone communications have been cited as tools for Cyber bullying. According to Hopline, what appalls even more is that Cyber bullying occurs during kids’ class time. Hopline cites that cyber bullying has far reaching implications on kids, so that the victims (kids) of cyber bullying only feel safe when in their bedrooms. According to Hopline, it does not under all circumstances hold that cyber bullying causes physical harm. However, cyber bullying is mostly associated with causation of harmful emotional fallout which may cumulate to other gar reaching consequences. Hopeline cites an example of Megan Meier; the girl aged 13 who committed suicide after belittlement by a hacker (her mother’s friend) that posed on MySpace as a boy aged 16 years. Hopline acknowledges that peer to peer cyber bullying is the most rampant, but its implications are not so severe. Effective curbing of cyber bullying would entail instilling of ethical morals among the youth, which will help them suit to information technologies. Hopline argues that there can be no an over-reactive approach as parents barring their kids from accessing technology in attempt to curb cyber bullying. Hopline suggests that an appropriate ramification procedure would entail the parents convening to open meetings, where then the parents can share and appropriately advice their kids on cyber bullying. Parents should be tactical so to dispel rebellion from their kids. Parents should not ignore the fact that all have under high risks of cyber bullying; terms such as ‘some kids are immune’ should not exist since all are sensitive to belittlement. Other intervention techniques should encompass teaching the kids on the importance of respect. In the case where kids are cyber-bullied, appropriate intervention procedures should be followed before the situation gets out of hand. It is factual that kids are major victims of cyber bullying. It is also true that cyber bullying is so rampant that it has extended into kids’ classroom. The proposed techniques are also appropriate, but to limited extend. However, Hopline misses out a point in assuming that moral deviance among kids is to blame for rampant cyber bullying. Hopline forgets that adults (such as the Megan Meier’s hacker) are part of cyber-bullies. Due to this, Hopline also misses out a point in laying emphasis on the need for parents to be outgoing in advising their kids. How could this connected with addressing adult-to-kid cyber bullying? Hopline should have gone extra mile to address adult-to-kid cyber bullying, if only cyber-bullying is to be curbed. The use of Network Intrusion and Detection System (NIDS) in curbing cyber crimes (Mell 68). NIDS refers to a system designed to detect suspect or malicious activities.